From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 2GB limit for temp_file_limit on 32bit platform |
Date: | 2012-07-20 05:45:34 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAO5G=EPTdn8883MopT+vaFMV5r+9C5cbfRwNB_W2nsGA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2012/7/20 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2012/7/20 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> I did a backport of temp_file_limit feature to 9.1, but when we tested
>>> this patch, we found very restristrictive limit to 2GB.
>>
>>> 2GB is nonsense, because this is session limit of temp files, and
>>> these files should be longer than 2GB.
>>
>> This claim is nonsense. The variable's value is measured in KB, so the
>> effective limit is actually 2TB not 2GB.
>
> you have true - it works on 9.2. The problem will be somewhere in
> backport on 9.1
it works well with 9.1.4, but not with 9.1.3
>
> sorry for false alarm
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel Stěhule
>
>>
>> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-07-20 06:31:33 | Re: row literal problem |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-07-20 05:08:14 | Re: 2GB limit for temp_file_limit on 32bit platform |