From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1 |
Date: | 2014-08-21 15:05:54 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAAH5tnQEj8OyikoUGNo-UWFvULquNFs+J6kRFkCZGL0w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2014-08-21 17:00 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> > "Heikki" == Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> writes:
> > Heikki> I think we should bite the bullet and rename the extension,
>
> > I agree, the contrib/cube patch as posted is purely so we could test
> > everything without having to argue over the new name first.
>
> I wonder if you've tried hard enough to avoid reserving the keyword.
>
> I think that the cube extension is not going to be the only casualty
> if "cube" becomes a reserved word --- that seems like a name that
> could be in use in lots of applications. ("What do you mean, 9.5
> breaks our database for tracking office space?") It would be worth
> quite a bit of effort to avoid that.
>
My prototypes worked without reserved keywords if I remember well
but analyzer is relatively complex
Pavel
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-08-21 15:15:24 | Hardening pg_upgrade |
Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2014-08-21 15:01:16 | Re: WIP Patch for GROUPING SETS phase 1 |