Re: enhanced error fields

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Matthew Woodcraft <matthew(at)woodcraft(dot)me(dot)uk>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: enhanced error fields
Date: 2012-07-04 18:10:14
Message-ID: CAFj8pRA8hnxW=dMGPOqHWT28tNrxmdcSQScrq2bSHMb6k0zzgQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2012/7/4 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> I think if you don't have a true constraint name to use here, you
>> shouldn't use anything.
>
> Yeah, I agree.  Don't invent a value, just omit the field.

ok

Pavel

>
>                         regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boszormenyi Zoltan 2012-07-04 18:36:08 Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2012-07-04 17:56:48 Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1