| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Review: check existency of table for -t option (pg_dump) when pattern... |
| Date: | 2015-09-14 10:07:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRA7s9x_Y1eGbkbBUPkNYO2zKY2nB_w_AQjYXgq9cnLncg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-09-14 12:05 GMT+02:00 Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>:
> (new version in attach), but patch shows some inconsistent output:
>> % pg_dump -t 'aaa*' postgres
>> pg_dump: No matching tables were found
>> % pg_dump -t 'aaa*' --strict-names postgres
>> pg_dump: Table "aaa*" not found.
>>
>
> There are two different situation - first message says "there are not any
>> table
>> for work", second says "There are not specific table(s) with specific
>> names
>> (mask)". I am thinking so this information is enough interesting for
>> showing.
>>
> Agree, but "aaa*" is not a table
>
>
>> Can be changed to "No matching table(s) were found for filter "aaa*" " ?
>>
>
> "TBL" is not a filter. May be:
>
> No matching table(s) were found for pattern "aaa*" ?
> No matching table(s) were found for pattern "TBL" ?
+1
it is better
Pavel
>
>
> --
> Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
> WWW:
> http://www.sigaev.ru/
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2015-09-14 10:09:01 | Re: PATCH: index-only scans with partial indexes |
| Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2015-09-14 10:05:56 | Re: Review: check existency of table for -t option (pg_dump) when pattern... |