| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov(at)dc(dot)baikal(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: temporal support patch |
| Date: | 2012-08-20 03:23:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRA764QUinPvVbdcTT0WZboLfNzX3k1QziFviHctanSN4A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> If there is some syntax that offers a convenient shorthand for WHERE,
> that's fine with me. Or using two tables, one called foo and one called
> foo_history, is also fine. But I don't want the DML syntax to introduce
> new mechanisms that aren't available without the fancy syntax (though
> new DDL arrangements might be fine).
>
convention foo_history is used often - and it should be significant
break for migration
Regards
Pavel Stehule
> Regards,
> Jeff Davis
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2012-08-20 04:07:51 | Re: [PATCH] Docs: Make notes on sequences and rollback more obvious |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2012-08-20 03:13:37 | Re: gistchoose vs. bloat |