| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Name spacing functions and stored procedures |
| Date: | 2015-03-19 05:37:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRA6_1OT5qiPFfGGcYe67yfZ1E6sO_wXZZHZbqiy8eFfsg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi
2015-03-19 2:56 GMT+01:00 Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> What do you guys do to namespace your functions so that they are not
> jumbled in with the system functions and also somewhat hierarchically
> organized.
>
> Obviously it's possible to create schemas for different namespaces but
> that can lead to a lot of schemas which hold no data. The other way is to
> simply name your functions like _lib_etl_csv_import_weird_data_format but
> that's not too much fun either.
>
What is problem with schemas? It is tool for logical database structuring -
for tables, for functions.
I use schemas without any problems.
>
> Just curious how other people deal with the issue.
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rajagopal NS | 2015-03-19 06:01:41 | Installation Size showing huge size in postgres installed on windows os |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2015-03-19 04:01:33 | Re: Archeiving and Purging |