From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> |
Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 |
Date: | 2014-09-04 11:47:22 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRA2EmRvLOLVYAdCk+BGcD05n8jQxaVr4h5EaMrQyQNbdQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2014-09-04 13:37 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>:
> Everyone,
>
> I've started a wiki page with the list of the things I could think of at
> this very moment. I probably got the most annoying ones in there, but I
> also might have forgotten about some things. I invite discussion of every
> suggestion on -HACKERS.
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Improving_PL/PgSQL_(September_2014)
>
> I'm sure other people's lists would look different; perhaps they should be
> added to the same page? Should we divide it based on who's suggesting the
> change to keep a better track?
>
> Anyway, you can start shooting now that we have at least one list of
> concrete proposals.
>
where I can wrote comments?
Usually I wrote them but I have to repeat it.
I am sorry, It is difficult - your usage of plpgsql is sometimes less, some
times more against best practices :(
PL functions should not be only envelope to SQL statement
Pavel
>
>
> .marko
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2014-09-04 11:54:52 | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 |
Previous Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2014-09-04 11:37:14 | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 |