Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca" <movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date: 2020-12-08 05:28:35
Message-ID: CAFj8pRA1KV5+0mUbz9=rQy_Lfp+D7bwF5PU-OnoWe9P8an1zMw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

čt 26. 11. 2020 v 12:46 odesílatel 曾文旌 <wenjing(dot)zwj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com> napsal:

> This is the latest patch for feature GTT(v38).
> Everybody, if you have any questions, please let me know.
>

please, co you send a rebased patch. It is broken again

Regards

Pavel

>
> Wenjing
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-12-08 05:35:09 Re: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-12-08 05:27:39 Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?