From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Pengchengliu <pengchengliu(at)tju(dot)edu(dot)cn>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: suboverflowed subtransactions concurrency performance optimize |
Date: | 2021-12-03 06:26:58 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-vwCOk0KgZmz-_bLRru1G_-6+Vp2YHzSBaoVL-HacuyAw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 5:49 PM Simon Riggs
<simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> transam.c uses a single item cache to prevent thrashing from repeated
> lookups, which reduces problems with shared access to SLRUs.
> multitrans.c also has similar.
>
> I notice that subtrans. doesn't have this, but could easily do so.
> Patch attached, which seems separate to other attempts at tuning.
Yeah, this definitely makes sense.
> On review, I think it is also possible that we update subtrans ONLY if
> someone uses >PGPROC_MAX_CACHED_SUBXIDS.
> This would make subtrans much smaller and avoid one-entry-per-page
> which is a major source of cacheing.
> This would means some light changes in GetSnapshotData().
> Let me know if that seems interesting also?
Do you mean to say avoid setting the sub-transactions parent if the
number of sun-transactions is not crossing PGPROC_MAX_CACHED_SUBXIDS?
But the TransactionIdDidCommit(), might need to fetch the parent if
the transaction status is TRANSACTION_STATUS_SUB_COMMITTED, so how
would we handle that?
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-12-03 06:41:47 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-12-03 06:16:55 | Re: [PATCH] support tab-completion for single quote input with equal sign |