Re: trying again to get incremental backup

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: trying again to get incremental backup
Date: 2023-09-04 12:41:53
Message-ID: CAFiTN-vi5SZj_A=_Z9=R7TG+6tvF1gD7NhX7XE+QUDQKsVEXpw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:20 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Unless someone has a brilliant idea that I lack, this suggests to me
> that this whole line of testing is a dead end. I can, of course, write
> tests that compare clusters *logically* -- do the correct relations
> exist, are they accessible, do they have the right contents?

Can't we think of comparing at the block level, like we can compare
each block but ignore the content of the hole?

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2023-09-04 12:57:33 Re: Speaker Bureau
Previous Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2023-09-04 12:38:46 RE: Subscription statistics are not dropped at DROP SUBSCRIPTION in some cases