From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_get_wal_replay_pause_state() should not return 'paused' while a promotion is ongoing. |
Date: | 2021-05-19 05:49:13 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-vgo9VnNDq2EaPfFBzpmUt=DjwzyY8xaC9ss3Pz9Y3OMw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:16 AM Fujii Masao
<masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2021/05/18 15:46, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 12:48:38PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >> Currently a promotion causes all available WAL to be replayed before
> >> a standby becomes a primary whether it was in paused state or not.
> >> OTOH, something like immediate promotion (i.e., standby becomes
> >> a primary without replaying outstanding WAL) might be useful for
> >> some cases. I don't object to that.
> >
> > Sounds like a "promotion immediate" mode. It does not sound difficult
> > nor expensive to add a small test for that in one of the existing
> > recovery tests triggerring a promotion. Could you add one based on
> > pg_get_wal_replay_pause_state()?
>
> You're thinking to add the test like the following?
> #1. Pause the recovery
> #2. Confirm that pg_get_wal_replay_pause_state() returns 'paused'
> #3. Trigger standby promotion
> #4. Confirm that pg_get_wal_replay_pause_state() returns 'not paused'
>
> It seems not easy to do the test #4 stably because
> pg_get_wal_replay_pause_state() needs to be executed
> before the promotion finishes.
Even for #2, we can not ensure that whether it will be 'paused' or
'pause requested'.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-05-19 06:25:29 | Re: pg_get_wal_replay_pause_state() should not return 'paused' while a promotion is ongoing. |
Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-05-19 05:34:31 | Re: postgres_fdw - should we tighten up batch_size, fetch_size options against non-numeric values? |