From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de>, Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in joinrels.c |
Date: | 2016-08-08 11:28:51 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-vdw-xXBufNETj=CFbJgZE1uQ86c8eDJy==UY8HWNJM1A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think that's just making life difficult. If nothing else, sqlsmith
> hunts around for functions it can call that return internal errors,
> and if we refuse to fix all of them to return user-facing errors, then
> it's just crap for the people running sqlsmith to sift through and
> it's a judgment call whether to fix each particular case. Even aside
> from that, I think it's much better to have a clear and unambiguous
> rule that elog is only for can't-happen things, not
> we-don't-recommend-it things.
>
I have changed for all these function to report more appropriate error with
ereport.
I used ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE error code for reporting such errors.
I think this is closest error code among all existing error codes, other
options can be (ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE).
But I think ERRCODE_WRONG_OBJECT_TYPE is better option.
Patch attached for the same.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
cache_lookup_failure_v1.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-08-08 11:41:19 | Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in joinrels.c |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-08-08 11:13:40 | Re: Wait events monitoring future development |