From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Asif Rehman <asifr(dot)rehman(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgbench - allow to create partitioned tables |
Date: | 2019-09-13 08:17:23 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-vV0EE62wPib5tiFC0bMB2avjH2FWkLNwzTHQ=qLqFLAg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:35 PM Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
Thanks for the updated version of the patch.
> > Generally, we give one blank line between the variable declaration and
> > the first statement of the block.
>
> Ok.
>
> > (p-1) -> (p - 1)
>
> Ok.
>
> > I am just wondering will it be a good idea to expand it to support
> > multi-level partitioning?
>
> ISTM that how the user could specify multi-level parameters is pretty
> unclear, so I would let that as a possible extension if someone wants it
> enough.
Ok
>
> Attached v6 implements the two cosmetic changes outlined above.
+ /* For RANGE, we use open-ended partitions at the beginning and end */
+ if (p == 1)
+ sprintf(minvalue, "minvalue");
+ else
+ sprintf(minvalue, INT64_FORMAT, (p-1) * part_size + 1);
+
+ if (p < partitions)
+ sprintf(maxvalue, INT64_FORMAT, p * part_size + 1);
+ else
+ sprintf(maxvalue, "maxvalue");
I do not understand the reason why first partition need to be
open-ended? Because we are clear that the minimum value of the aid is
1 in pgbench_accout. So if you directly use
sprintf(minvalue, INT64_FORMAT, (p-1) * part_size + 1); then also it
will give 1 as minvalue for the first partition and that will be the
right thing to do. Am I missing something here?
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2019-09-13 08:20:18 | Re: pgbench - allow to create partitioned tables |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2019-09-13 08:06:46 | Re: proposal - patch: psql - sort_by_size |