Re: Toast compression method options

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Toast compression method options
Date: 2021-10-01 09:11:46
Message-ID: CAFiTN-v23k56Wzbse1EhKV8Y0rJ79eVjg09K04kL8M8wdLxUuA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:42 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 05:10:22PM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > I haved rebased the patch.
>
> Please note that the patch does not apply. FWIW, I still don't think
> that this is a good idea to have that. I don't recall seeing much on
> this list that users would like to have such a level of tuning for
> pglz, while lz4 only offers the option to reduce the compression rate
> while being already very cheap in CPU so the impact is limited. On
> top of that, this adds a new attribute to pg_attribute with much more
> complexity into ALTER TABLE code paths in tablecmds.c..

Thanks for the feedback, seeing no much interest from other hackers
and also as Michael pointed out that there is no much use case for
this, I am withdrawing this patch from the commitfest.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-10-01 09:12:05 Re: Logical replication keepalive flood
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-10-01 09:11:21 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side