From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) |
Date: | 2017-03-30 09:59:45 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-urZfe8vZsa_dpquooiTyr3P3UEGEZng=hkOEkWaD4_mg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Pavan Deolasee
<pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks. I think your patch of tracking interesting attributes seems ok too
> after the performance issue was addressed. Even though we can still improve
> that further, at least Mithun confirmed that there is no significant
> regression anymore and in fact for one artificial case, patch does better
> than even master.
I was trying to compile these patches on latest
head(f90d23d0c51895e0d7db7910538e85d3d38691f0) for some testing but I
was not able to compile it.
make[3]: *** [postgres.bki] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/dilip/work/pg_codes/pbms_final/postgresql/src/backend/catalog'
make[2]: *** [submake-schemapg] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/dilip/work/pg_codes/pbms_final/postgresql/src/backend'
make[1]: *** [all-backend-recurse] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dilip/work/pg_codes/pbms_final/postgresql/src'
make: *** [all-src-recurse] Error 2
I tried doing maintainer-clean, deleting postgres.bki but still the same error.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-03-30 10:21:53 | Re: Supporting huge pages on Windows |
Previous Message | Venkata B Nagothi | 2017-03-30 09:59:15 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least 9.5)? |