| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Move pg_attribute.attcompression to earlier in struct for reduced size? |
| Date: | 2021-05-21 06:55:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-uh752J_VL+DnjddBbf8LDqEjZR2iw9tAdUieSXnHLT9A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 12:02 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 10:24:36AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > If you switch attcompression, I'd say to go for the others while on
> > it. It would not be the first time in history there is a catalog
> > version bump between betas.
>
> This is still an open item. FWIW, I can get behind the reordering
> proposed by Tom for the consistency gained with pg_type, leading to
> the attached to reduce the size of FormData_pg_attribute from 116b to
> 112b.
This makes sense, thanks for working on this.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com | 2021-05-21 07:26:32 | RE: Forget close an open relation in ReorderBufferProcessTXN() |
| Previous Message | osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com | 2021-05-21 06:55:10 | RE: Forget close an open relation in ReorderBufferProcessTXN() |