Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Date: 2017-01-12 12:17:30
Message-ID: CAFiTN-uf4vbp0-5XDcBQqafRU9wdQimYsZkKJCs9eHnxz3BdZw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Rafia Sabih
<rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello Dilip,
> I was trying to test the performance of all the parallel query related
> patches on TPC-H queries, I found that when parallel hash [1 ]and your
> patch are applied then Q10 and Q14 were hanged, however, without any
> one of these patches, these queries are running fine. Following is the
> stack trace,

Thanks for reporting, I will look into this.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-01-12 12:19:13 Unused member root in foreign_glob_cxt
Previous Message Gilles Darold 2017-01-12 12:14:28 Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function