From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: parallel vacuum - few questions on docs, comments and code |
Date: | 2021-05-14 05:13:20 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-uXdYn6PC+FKS5gmfTadh7smkzvqG54zLAieiaWBM-iCw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 9:00 PM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Done that way.
>
> PSA patch.
Your changes look good. About changing the "non-negative integer" to
"greater than or equal to zero", there is another thread [1], I am not
sure that have we concluded anything there yet.
- pg_log_error("parallel vacuum degree must be a non-negative integer");
+ pg_log_error("parallel workers for vacuum must be greater than or
equal to zero");
exit(1);
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-05-14 05:24:30 | Re: Race condition in recovery? |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-05-14 05:12:31 | Re: Race condition in recovery? |