| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New WAL record to detect the checkpoint redo location |
| Date: | 2023-08-25 05:38:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-uJ7AYcS4nnrTUYQbR1dYwaF45eKzdmi_MrOz+C9pS-4A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 10:12 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 5:24 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 01:11:50PM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > > Yeah right, actually I was confused, I assumed it will return the
> > > start LSN of the record. And I do not see any easy way to identify
> > > the Start LSN of this record so maybe this solution will not work. I
> > > will have to think of something else. Thanks for pointing it out.
> >
> > About that. One thing to consider may be ReserveXLogInsertLocation()
> > while holding the WAL insert lock, but you can just rely on
> > ProcLastRecPtr for the job after inserting the REDO record, no?
>
> Yeah right, we can use ProcLastRecPtr. I will send the updated patch.
Here is the updated version of the patch.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-New-WAL-record-for-checkpoint-redo-location.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shveta malik | 2023-08-25 05:39:01 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2023-08-25 05:37:29 | Re: broken master regress tests |