From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Assertion failure while streaming toasted data |
Date: | 2021-05-26 08:17:41 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-uGvOGDXdbTLx0w4u0mn8cqPQ=3uxZj3W_qS0i0Hc_8Vw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:53 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:19 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> > I searched and didn't find any similar existing tests. Can we think of
> > any other way to test this code path? We already have one copy test in
> > toast.sql, isn't it possible to write a similar test here?
>
> I will check that and let you know.
I have followed this approach to write the test.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0001-Fix-bug-while-streaming-the-multi-insert-toast-ch.patch | text/x-patch | 77.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2021-05-26 08:23:16 | Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-05-26 08:00:22 | Re: [BUG] Autovacuum not dynamically decreasing cost_limit and cost_delay |