On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 4:44 PM Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> wrote:
> > On 6 Nov 2023, at 14:31, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > dynahash is notoriously slow, which is why we have simplehash.h since
> > commit b30d3ea824c5. Maybe we could use that instead.
>
> Dynahash has lock partitioning. Simplehash has not, AFAIK.
Yeah, Simplehash doesn't have partitioning so with simple hash we will
be stuck with the centralized control lock that is one of the main
problems trying to solve here.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com