From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof? |
Date: | 2019-09-05 10:17:36 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-tk7apiURLCJiJtimoHvY5ScwnvnDDYTkZaDQw8qUs+ew@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:26 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:33 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > /*
> > + * For inheritance child relations, we also need to remember
> > + * the root parent.
> > + */
> > + if (parent->rtekind == RTE_RELATION)
> > + rel->inh_root_relid = parent->inh_root_relid > 0 ?
> > + parent->inh_root_relid :
> > + parent->relid;
> > + else
> > + /* Child relation of flattened UNION ALL subquery. */
> > + rel->inh_root_relid = relid;
> >
> > With the current changes, parent->inh_root_relid will always be > 0 so
> > (parent->inh_root_relid > 0) condition doesn't make sence. Right?
>
> Oops, you're right. It should be:
>
> if (parent->rtekind == RTE_RELATION)
> rel->inh_root_relid = parent->inh_root_relid;
> else
> rel->inh_root_relid = relid;
>
Right!
> Updated patch attached.
>
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-09-05 12:16:11 | Re: BUG #15977: Inconsistent behavior in chained transactions |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2019-09-05 09:56:29 | Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof? |