| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUG]Update Toast data failure in logical replication |
| Date: | 2021-06-04 04:08:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-t2k-DOuuvc7iSO5ZvGWhaYEVmFXvF3Z=rqPzt8dRyYrQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 8:25 AM tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 7:45 PMDilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I have fixed all the pending issues, I see there is already a test
> > case for this so I have changed the output for that.
>
> Thanks for your patch. I tested it for all branches(10,11,12,13,HEAD) and all of them passed.(This bug was introduced in PG-10.)
> I also tested the scenario where I found this bug, data could be synchronized after your fix.
Thanks for verifying this.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2021-06-04 04:28:05 | Re: Are we missing (void) when return value of fsm_set_and_search is ignored? |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-06-04 03:28:46 | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 |