Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum
Date: 2019-12-10 07:57:20
Message-ID: CAFiTN-t2J4Gf4SVeZvjYqDEsAJf-e2hqSJ7ouej4F7EMcpRSbQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 2:37 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 2:27 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I have modified the patch for the above points and additionally ran
> > pgindent. Let me know what you think about the attached patch?
> >
>
> A new version with a slightly modified commit message.

Your changes look fine to me. Thanks!

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2019-12-10 07:59:25 Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2019-12-10 06:53:56 Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test