Re: Parallel heap vacuum

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel heap vacuum
Date: 2025-01-17 09:42:57
Message-ID: CAFiTN-sh1Vx94ors3AN7rRRAMdiT6vNYzFZf+Q9xiGBquMm3YQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 6:37 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 1:34 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
>

IIRC, there was one of the blocker for implementing parallel heap vacuum
was group locking, have we already resolved that issue or its being
included in this patch set?

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2025-01-17 09:50:37 Re: Change GUC hashtable to use simplehash?
Previous Message Yuki Seino 2025-01-17 09:29:50 Re: Add “FOR UPDATE NOWAIT” lock details to the log.