| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Issue in pg_catalog.pg_indexes view definition |
| Date: | 2016-07-14 08:29:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-sdp31upXTMrfOWgbsftmhT5Zbp681T4KBRkB4E7D_G4g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> - pg_get_indexdef(I.oid) AS indexdef
> + pg_get_indexdef(X.indexrelid) AS indexdef
> Fixing it this way looks like a good idea to me to bypass those cache
> lookup errors caused by non-index relations. Now I think that you need
> as well to update the regression test output.
>
I observed one regression failure caused by this fix. So fixed the same in
new patch.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pg_indexes_fix_v1.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | AMatveev | 2016-07-14 08:41:07 | Re: One process per session lack of sharing |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2016-07-14 08:21:14 | Re: Issue in pg_catalog.pg_indexes view definition |