From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics |
Date: | 2016-02-29 05:12:42 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-sS3jDOg3UXuZ2PX7JEjnu9PoWHz7wOWbhiW9LH=V+rvg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> Have you tried by reverting the commits 6150a1b0 and ac1d794, which I
> think effects read-only performance and sometimes create variation in TPS
> across different runs, here second might have less impact, but first one
> could impact performance? Is it possible for you to get perf data with and
> without patch and share with others?
>
I only reverted ac1d794 commit in my test, In my next run I will revert
6150a1b0 also and test.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Armor | 2016-02-29 06:05:00 | Re: get current log file |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2016-02-29 05:01:02 | Re: Declarative partitioning |