From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |
Date: | 2017-05-13 06:41:09 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-sA9E0R4is1K5bKDGYeYYMQVQR3GTidQy=kVT-RfNTVXQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 6:08 PM, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please find the following updated patches attached:
I have done some testing with the new patch, most of the cases worked
as per the expectation except below
I expect the planner to select only "Seq Scan on t1" whereas it's
scanning both the partitions?
create table t (a int, b varchar) partition by hash(a);
create table t1 partition of t for values with (modulus 8, remainder 0);
create table t2 partition of t for values with (modulus 8, remainder 1);
postgres=# explain select * from t where a=8;
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------
Append (cost=0.00..51.75 rows=12 width=36)
-> Seq Scan on t1 (cost=0.00..25.88 rows=6 width=36)
Filter: (a = 8)
-> Seq Scan on t2 (cost=0.00..25.88 rows=6 width=36)
Filter: (a = 8)
(5 rows)
Some cosmetic comments.
-----------------------------------
+ RangeVar *rv = makeRangeVarFromNameList(castNode(List, nameEl->arg));
+
Useless Hunk.
/*
- * Build a CREATE SEQUENCE command to create the sequence object, and
- * add it to the list of things to be done before this CREATE/ALTER
- * TABLE.
+ * Build a CREATE SEQUENCE command to create the sequence object, and add
+ * it to the list of things to be done before this CREATE/ALTER TABLE.
*/
Seems like, in src/backend/parser/parse_utilcmd.c, you have changed
the existing code with
pgindent. I think it's not a good idea to mix pgindent changes with your patch.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-05-13 11:19:52 | Re: Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2017-05-13 04:52:10 | Re: Hash Functions |