Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory
Date: 2021-06-10 08:42:25
Message-ID: CAFiTN-s3CBwexFVR9=hF4dypxK27YQCTYVfsDj8ZC5OF=ah8WA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 8:59 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> May I suggest to use a different name in the blurt_and_lock_123()
> function, so that it doesn't conflict with the one in
> insert-conflict-specconflict? Thanks

Renamed to blurt_and_lock(), is that fine?

I haved fixed other comments and also prepared patches for the back branches.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v5-0001-Bug-fix-for-speculative-abort_HEAD.patch text/x-patch 6.0 KB
v5-0001-Bug-fix-for-speculative-abort-v10.patch text/x-patch 5.9 KB
v5-0001-Bug-fix-for-speculative-abort-v12_and_v13.patch text/x-patch 5.7 KB
v5-0001-Bug-fix-for-speculative-abort-v96.patch text/x-patch 6.0 KB
v5-0001-Bug-fix-for-speculative-abort-v11.patch text/x-patch 5.7 KB
v5-0002-Test-logical-decoding-of-speculative-aborts_HEAD.patch text/x-patch 13.3 KB
v5-0002-Test-logical-decoding-of-speculative-aborts-v10.patch text/x-patch 13.3 KB
v5-0002-Test-logical-decoding-of-speculative-aborts-v11.patch text/x-patch 13.3 KB
v5-0002-Test-logical-decoding-of-speculative-aborts-v12_and_v13.patch text/x-patch 13.3 KB
v5-0002-Test-logical-decoding-of-speculative-aborts-v96.patch text/x-patch 13.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-06-10 08:42:35 Re: CALL versus procedures with output-only arguments
Previous Message Ajin Cherian 2021-06-10 08:34:15 Re: Decoding of two-phase xacts missing from CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT command