Re: Next release

From: Harshal Dhumal <harshal(dot)dhumal(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Surinder Kumar <surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Next release
Date: 2017-08-24 19:28:43
Message-ID: CAFiP3vw0ie9Y_JGbqssYKcVSdt3-KiOERbpaN0AP3ARLesKhGA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

--
*Harshal Dhumal*
*Sr. Software Engineer*

EnterpriseDB India: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Surinder Kumar <
> surinder(dot)kumar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone object to doing a release on 14th September, wrapping the code on
>>> Monday 11th? This seems like the best option for our QA folks who will be
>>> off for EID somewhen in the two weeks before.
>>>
>>> Assuming not, should this be 1.7 or 2.0?
>>>
>>> If we go with 2.0, it'll be for "safety" given the proposed changes to
>>> path management to allow both server and desktop modes to work out of the
>>> box on Linux.
>>>
>>> If we do that, we also need to ensure that any changes to the config
>>> database are backwards compatible, as a 2.0 release would be a side-by-side
>>> installation. Surinder; was it you that had looked into that?
>>>
>> ​I had looked into this and here are my findings:
>> 1. If we are using newer version of pgAdmin and the go back to older
>> version of pgAdmin, then on running `python pgAdmin4.py`. the
>> flask-migrate(Alembic) try to perform downgrade by one step only(ie. it can
>> switch back to one migration only when we run `python pgAdmin4.py`). But
>> we have multiple database revisions to be migrated. So migration fails here.
>>
>> 2. When Alebmic downgrade is performed by one step, it looks for
>> downgrade function in that specific database revision, but in our code we
>> didn't written downgrade function. But if we have written downgrade
>> statement, still there is an issue:
>> ie. If we add a new column to a table xyz using ALTER statement like:
>>
>> ​```
>> ​
>> def upgrade():
>> ​ ​
>> verison = get_version()
>>
>> ​ ​
>> db.engine.execute(
>> ​ ​
>> 'ALTER TABLE server ADD COLUMN hostaddr TEXT(1024)'
>> ​ ​
>> )
>>
>> def downgrade():
>> ​ ​
>> pass
>> ​```​
>> then on downgrade it executes `downgrade` method, so downgrade should
>> have code like
>> `ALTER TABLE server DROP COLUMN hostaddr `
>> but in sqlite DROP COLUMN statements don't work.
>> So, this is a an issue with Sqlite database. However, an alternative way
>> is also given. Here is link
>> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5938048/delete-column-from-sqlite-table>
>>
>>
>> Still, I didn't find any other solution on upgrading/downgrading database
>> revisions without errors.
>> It is an issue with Flask-Migrate(Alembic) plugin.
>>
>
>
> Urgh. So I guess the other option is that we version the DB filename as
> well. The downside of that is that users will want to migrate their
> settings - which may be awkward as we'll have no real way of knowing where
> they are.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Or should we write our own custom backword migrations? For eg. dropping
column can be achieved by creating another table excluding the columns
which we want to drop then copy data to new table and then drop old table
and rename new table to old name. And also sqlite database schema which we
have in pgAdmin4 is small so writing and maintaining custom migration won
be that hard.

--
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2017-08-24 19:33:26 Re: Next release
Previous Message Dave Page 2017-08-24 16:14:35 Re: Next release