From: | Anthony Hall <eat(dot)drink(dot)be(dot)merry(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | How to handle CASE statement with PostgreSQL without need for typecasting |
Date: | 2020-02-18 18:40:58 |
Message-ID: | CAFhuWu_vTQr0NSGiKSua8JPfHwGXSH_uQ6bzBWf_bRuKMu3a1g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello,
Trying to find a way to perform a CASE statement without needing to
typecast. Research so far suggests that this is not possible, but I wanted
to check with the PSQL community to be sure.
Steps:
1. CREATE TABLE t_update (F1 timestamp(6) NULL )
2. Run statement UPDATE t_update SET F1 = (CASE WHEN (CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
IS NULL ) THEN (CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ) ELSE (CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ) END)
Result: No exceptions.
3. Run parametrised statement
UPDATE t_update SET F1 = (CASE WHEN (? IS NULL ) THEN (? ) ELSE (? ) END)
Result: Error
ERROR: VERROR; column "f1" is of type timestamp without time zone but
expression is of type text(Hint You will need to rewrite or cast the
expression.; Position 27; File
d:\pginstaller.auto\postgres.windows-x64\src\backend\parser\parse_target.c;
Line 591; Routine transformAssignedExpr; ) (6822148)
NOTE: From my research online, I found that typecasting works and also the
error from the database suggests typecasting.
This statement works:
UPDATE t_update SET F1 = (CASE WHEN (?::timestamp(6) IS NULL ) THEN
(?::timestamp(6) ) ELSE (?::timestamp(6) ) END)
Please let me know your thoughts.
Many thanks!
Anthony
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2020-02-18 18:49:50 | Re: DB running out of memory issues after upgrade |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-02-18 18:40:37 | Re: DB running out of memory issues after upgrade |