Re: Unable to start replica after failover

From: Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Lahnov, Igor" <Igor(dot)Lahnov(at)nexign(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Timonin, Alexey" <Alexey(dot)Timonin(at)nexign(dot)com>, "Dmitriyev, Andrey" <Andrey(dot)Dmitriyev(at)nexign(dot)com>, "Vassiliev, Andrey" <Andrey(dot)Vassiliev(at)nexign(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Unable to start replica after failover
Date: 2022-08-25 05:23:17
Message-ID: CAFh8B==MRJTyV80gN58fvhBvX18R0teB=F72c_fmQcWa8hp-zA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 13:37, Lahnov, Igor <Igor(dot)Lahnov(at)nexign(dot)com> wrote:

>
>
> Yes, Postgres asks for 000000020000054E000000FB and gets renamed
> 000000020000054E000000FB.partial (without *partial* postfix).
>

But why? This is totally weird and unexpected behavior. Why pg_probackup is
doing this?

Regards,
--
Alexander Kukushkin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message gzh 2022-08-25 05:56:03 Re:Re: pg_dump without setting search_path
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2022-08-25 04:19:03 Re: pg_dump without setting search_path