Re: BUG #11528: Max Index Keys

From: Paul Dasari <pdasari(at)mdsol(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #11528: Max Index Keys
Date: 2014-09-30 19:55:17
Message-ID: CAFgphJpZnZCv8PzDsQTMjzk6cMhE+kHcsaCNyepwt1L+tr+Bxg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Ok. I am using SAP Business Objects - Information Design Tool.

Not sure if you have already knew about this page, however after looking at
this page i feel like a bug, because when i use the same JAR that came out
of this it perfectly worked fine

http://www.garrettpatterson.com/2013/08/13/connect-pentahomondrian-schema-workbench-to-amazon-redshift/

But would be good if it is coming directly from postgresql.

Thanks
Paul

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 3:34 PM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:

> On 9/30/2014 12:26 PM, Paul Dasari wrote:
>
> Thanks for the inputs with the mailing list.
> No matter which version i use the error exists.
> I don't know, it seems like a bug!
>
>
> afaik, JDBC itself doesn't do this test, so what software are you running
> in Java thats using JDBC ? Many Database GUI packages insist on primary
> keys, otherwise they can't reliably identify the row to delete or update in
> a 'data grid' style edit.
>
>
>
> --
> john r pierce 37N 122W
> somewhere on the middle of the left coast
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2014-09-30 20:10:25 Re: BUG #11528: Max Index Keys
Previous Message John R Pierce 2014-09-30 19:34:05 Re: BUG #11528: Max Index Keys