Re: Connection limit exceeded for non-superusers when there are plenty of available slots

From: Ned Wolpert <ned(dot)wolpert(at)imemories(dot)com>
To: G B <g(dot)b(dot)coder(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Connection limit exceeded for non-superusers when there are plenty of available slots
Date: 2013-02-28 21:35:40
Message-ID: CAFehBFkYmmnNnDpqHQ-Z5theyBPWLtHw+YapvqDGQwDA4z70zA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

From the docs:

"superuser_reserved_connections: Whenever the number of active concurrent
connections is at least max_connections minus
superuser_reserved_connections, new connections will be accepted only for
superusers, and no new replication connections will be accepted." (
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/runtime-config-connection.html)

So in your case, you have 480 connections for super users out of 50 total.
Its not that 20 of them are reserved for non-superusers.... so since you
have less then 480 connections available, only super users can use them. I
don't believe postgresql cares who is currently using a connection...
rather if the number of available connections is less then what is set in
'superuser_reserved_connections', only superusers can use it. (Someone can
correct me if I'm wrong here)

On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:17 PM, G B <g(dot)b(dot)coder(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> My intention was to have 480 max connections for super user and 20
> connections for non super user. (I created the non super user account for
> an external user to log into PgAdmin and look at the schema) Is there a
> problem with 20 connections in such a scenario?
>
> When I select from pg_stat_activity, I only see 62 connections from the
> super user (postgres) and that number is less than 480.
> I don't see any connections from non super user. Yet , when I try to login
> as non super user, it claims it ran out of non super user reserved
> connections.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:38 AM, G B <g(dot)b(dot)coder(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > SHOW superuser_reserved_connections;
>> >
>> > 480
>> >
>> > SHOW max_connections;
>> > 500
>> >
>> > Is there something I'm missing here? Thanks for your help.
>>
>> This leaves just 20 connections for non-root users. Did you intend to
>> set superuser_reserved_connections to 20, thus leaving 480 for normal
>> use?
>>
>> ChrisA
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>>
>
>

--
Virtually, Ned Wolpert

"Settle thy studies, Faustus, and begin..." --Marlowe

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2013-02-28 21:39:50 Re: postgresql log file not getting update
Previous Message G B 2013-02-28 21:17:38 Re: Connection limit exceeded for non-superusers when there are plenty of available slots