From: | Sri Linux <srilinux09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Need help with PITR for PostgreSQL 9.4.5 |
Date: | 2020-06-25 17:38:39 |
Message-ID: | CAFcfow-sD=D591oyV_gmZiEDC1gO7EZVS60ksUh0ChsbE0N8Zw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thank you all for the response,
Please find the method used. Please recommend me if I have done
something wrong...
Thanks and Regards,
sree
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:36 PM David G. Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The version you are running is neither up-to-date for its major version
> (9.4) nor is the major version being supported.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/
>
> Thoug a functioning backup is good to have before upgrading, especially
> major versions.
>
> On Wednesday, June 24, 2020, Sri Linux <srilinux09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to do PINT backup and recovery for the standalone
>> database which is not in a cluster.
>>
>
> That is not possible. Its unclear what exactly you mead/did though.
> Consider sharing actual commands/scripts.
>
> < 2020-06-22 16:34:08.487 CDT >LOG: WAL file is from different database
>> system: WAL file database system identifier is 6840038030519879233,
>> pg_control database system identifier is 6841285371464745049.
>>
>
> You cannot PITR if the WAL doesn’t match the base backup for the cluster
> you are trying to restore.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/continuous-archiving.html
>
> Or, probably better, consider using a third-party system.
>
> David J.
>
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pint recovery -support.txt | text/plain | 2.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matthias Apitz | 2020-06-25 18:03:29 | Re: error messages (autovaccum canceled and syntax errors) while loading a DUMP |
Previous Message | Michael Lewis | 2020-06-25 17:34:02 | Re: n_distinct off by a factor of 1000 |