From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Dong Wook Lee <sh95119(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add pg_freespacemap extension sql test |
Date: | 2022-03-23 13:45:19 |
Message-ID: | CAFcNs+r-2R0+XzscJxtHQO3miRTbaqoovLTQkXQ_j_sUO=woGg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 3:05 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> After review, I don't like much the idea of allowing concurrent
> autovacuums to run in parallel of the table(s) of this test, so we'd
> better disable it explicitely.
Make sense.
> "t1" is also a very generic name to use in a regression test.
Agreed!
> Another thing that itched me is that we
> could also test more with indexes, particularly with btree, BRIN and
> hash (the latter should not have a FSM with 10 pages as per the first
> group batch, and each one has a stable an initial state).
What about GIN/GIST indexes?
> I have extended the set of tests as of the attached, running these
> across everything I could (CI, all my hosts including Windows, macos,
> Linux). We could do more later, of course, but this looks enough to
> me as a first step. And I think that this will not upset the
> buildfarm.
Also LGTM.
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-03-23 14:07:06 | Re: clean up test_rls_hooks module |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-03-23 13:33:34 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |