From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Error message inconsistency |
Date: | 2019-03-22 23:03:20 |
Message-ID: | CAFcNs+qAAeXaZ-LBGhRuWwvf5KHdwCRwQ-stLnZnW_oRrbp0Qw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 2:25 PM Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> As noted by a PostgreSQL user to me, error messages for NOT NULL
constraints are inconsistent - they do not mention the relation name in the
message, as all other variants of this message do. e.g.
>
> postgres=# create table nn (id integer not null);
> CREATE TABLE
> postgres=# insert into nn values (NULL);
> ERROR: null value in column "id" violates not-null constraint
> DETAIL: Failing row contains (null).
>
> postgres=# create table nn2 (id integer check (id is not null));
> CREATE TABLE
> postgres=# insert into nn2 values (NULL);
> ERROR: new row for relation "nn2" violates check constraint "nn2_id_check"
> DETAIL: Failing row contains (null).
>
> I propose the attached patch as a fix, changing the wording (of the first
case) to
> ERROR: null value in column "id" for relation "nn" violates not-null
constraint
>
> It causes breakage in multiple tests, which is easy to fix once/if we
agree to change.
>
I totally agree with that change because I already get some negative
feedback from users about this message too.
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-03-22 23:16:07 | Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums |
Previous Message | Hadi Moshayedi | 2019-03-22 23:00:42 | Fix foreign key constraint check for partitioned tables |