From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add CREATE DATABASE LOCALE option |
Date: | 2019-06-06 19:03:48 |
Message-ID: | CAFcNs+pd2+u54zZc08=9Eo8=JxKcaA+JVOJZNSojcsA0LyJQUw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 6:38 AM Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-06-05 22:31, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 5:17 PM Peter Eisentraut
> > <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
> > <mailto:peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> I propose this patch to add a LOCALE option to CREATE DATABASE. This
> >> sets both LC_COLLATE and LC_CTYPE with one option. Similar behavior is
> >> already supported in initdb, CREATE COLLATION, and createdb.
> >>
> >> With collation providers other than libc, having separate lc_collate
and
> >> lc_ctype settings is not necessarily applicable, so this is also
> >> preparation for such future functionality.
> >
> > Cool... would be nice also add some test cases.
>
> Right. Any suggestions where to put them?
>
Hmm... good question... I thought we already have some regression tests for
{CREATE|DROP} DATABASE but actually we don't... should we add a new one?
Att,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-06-06 19:14:40 | Re: Sort support for macaddr8 |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2019-06-06 18:59:51 | Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions? |