Re: row filtering for logical replication

From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, hironobu(at)interdb(dot)jp
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Date: 2018-11-23 18:29:16
Message-ID: CAFcNs+pA9ywYJbf940UFXW5B5i+An3=0yzxC8_bXubu+CsOQ=A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 4:13 PM Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> >
> > If carefully documented I see no problem with it... we already have an
> > analogous problem with functional indexes.
>
> The difference is that with functional indexes you can recreate the
> missing object and everything is okay again. With logical replication
> recreating the object will not help.
>

In this case with logical replication you should rsync the object. That is
the price of misunderstanding / bad use of the new feature.

As usual, there are no free beer ;-)

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-11-23 18:45:47 Re: 64-bit hash function for hstore and citext data type
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2018-11-23 18:13:53 Re: row filtering for logical replication