Re: min_recovery_apply_delay

From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: min_recovery_apply_delay
Date: 2014-05-10 02:44:33
Message-ID: CAFcNs+of88rdS7gfbdOCU+G_cCs=d1q_+cRL8msbtecnbOQ9cQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em sexta-feira, 9 de maio de 2014, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
escreveu:

> Wouldn't a better name be recovery_min_apply_delay?
>
>
+1

The original name was recovery_apply_delay but in some point of review it
was changed to reflect better the limit.

> Other parameters are usually named something_min_something.
>
>
Ok

If you want I can send a patch to change it.

Fabrízio Mello.

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-05-10 03:30:15 Re: postgresql.auto.conf read from wrong directory
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-05-10 01:58:25 min_recovery_apply_delay