Re: Does Type Have = Operator?

From: Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Does Type Have = Operator?
Date: 2016-05-11 18:01:23
Message-ID: CAFcNs+o8gd9nEeVYFEoTaYwtZPOW7cVB=6F2ZvG1gON28tsLtg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:07 AM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On May 10, 2016, at 5:56 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <
fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Searching for the operator in pg_operator catalog isn't enought?
>
> Seems like overkill, but will do if there’s nothing else.
>

I know... but you can do that just in case the current behaviour fail by
cathing it with "begin...exception...", so you'll minimize the looking for
process on catalog.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-05-11 19:04:45 Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-05-11 17:58:23 Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered