From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Does Type Have = Operator? |
Date: | 2016-05-11 18:01:23 |
Message-ID: | CAFcNs+o8gd9nEeVYFEoTaYwtZPOW7cVB=6F2ZvG1gON28tsLtg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:07 AM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On May 10, 2016, at 5:56 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <
fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Searching for the operator in pg_operator catalog isn't enought?
>
> Seems like overkill, but will do if there’s nothing else.
>
I know... but you can do that just in case the current behaviour fail by
cathing it with "begin...exception...", so you'll minimize the looking for
process on catalog.
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-05-11 19:04:45 | Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-05-11 17:58:23 | Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered |