From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add important info about ANALYZE after create Functional Index |
Date: | 2020-10-28 12:35:21 |
Message-ID: | CAFcNs+o+iSTd+wZ2N-Js7yOxVKG+R-+i+_o5QFu5-v-5uiRnAw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:15 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:06:22AM -0300, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> > When we create a new table or index they will not have statistics until
an
> > ANALYZE happens. This is the default behaviour and I think is not a big
> > problem here, but we need to add some note on docs about the need of
> > statistics for indexes on expressions.
> >
> > But IMHO there is a misbehaviour with the implementation of
CONCURRENTLY on
> > REINDEX because running it will lose the statistics. Have a look the
> > example below:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > So IMHO here is the place we should rework a bit to execute ANALYZE as a
> > last step.
>
> I agree that this is not user-friendly, and I suspect that we will
> need to do something within index_concurrently_swap() to fill in the
> stats of the new index from the data of the old one (not looked at
> that in details yet).
>
We already do a similar thing for PgStats [1] so maybe we should also copy
pg_statistics from old to new index during the swap.
But I'm not sure if it's totally safe anyway and would be better to create
a new phase to issue ANALYZE if necessary (exists statistics for old index).
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
PostgreSQL Developer at OnGres Inc. - https://ongres.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-10-28 12:36:24 | Re: Allow some recovery parameters to be changed with reload |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-10-28 12:31:12 | Re: parallel distinct union and aggregate support patch |