| From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA |
| Date: | 2014-12-09 16:37:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAFcNs+o+DZ9znhdmz=kSRXBL3=mZiuvYjcVmT+9cerJdTfLcMg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > OK. Perhaps that's not worth mentioning in the release notes, but some
> > users may be used to the old behavior. What about the other issues
> > (regression test for permissions incorrect and matviews)?
> Here is in any case an updated patch to fix all those things rebased
> on latest HEAD (ae4e688).
>
The patch is fine:
- No compiler warnings
- Added properly regressions tests and run ok
There are no changes in the docs. Maybe we can mention matviews on REINDEX
SCHEMA docs, what do you think?
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io
>> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-12-09 17:41:46 | logical column ordering |
| Previous Message | Sawada Masahiko | 2014-12-09 15:34:21 | Re: Proposal : REINDEX SCHEMA |