Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16

From: MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16
Date: 2023-05-28 00:15:08
Message-ID: CAFbpF8NgYMT+r0bqke_e7AYD4bKzJaToJBhnZyJW9RyL0a8T1A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Results for 16 beta1 are similar to what I shared above:
* no regressions
* a few queries are >= 1.5 times faster which make the read-only
transaction >= 1.5 times faster

http://smalldatum.blogspot.com/2023/05/postgres-16beta1-looks-good-vs-sysbench.html

--
Mark Callaghan
mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-05-28 00:52:01 abi-compliance-checker
Previous Message Gurjeet Singh 2023-05-27 22:17:21 Document that server will start even if it's unable to open some TCP/IP ports