Re: Table Design question for gurus (without going to "NoSQL")...

From: Phoenix Kiula <phoenix(dot)kiula(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
Cc: David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Gavin Flower <gavinflower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Table Design question for gurus (without going to "NoSQL")...
Date: 2011-11-24 12:23:54
Message-ID: CAFWfU=so0Ugjf-2g8xBtAOmiTyvdTfjC-F1d+SGv3Pja+ub4Eg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> wrote:
.....
>>
>> An index on (a, b) can be used for queries involving only a but not for
>> those involving only b.
>
> That is not true since 8.2 - a multi-column index may be used even for
> queries without conditions on leading columns. It won't be as effective as
> with conditions on leading columns, because the whole index must be
> scanned, but it's usually much cheaper than keeping two indexes (memory
> requirements, overhead when inserting data etc.)
>
> Check this:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/indexes-multicolumn.html

Thanks Tomas. VERY useful information.

I've decided to go with a unique multicolumn index for now.

Will ask the experts here if I see some issues..

Thanks!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2011-11-24 13:20:59 Re: Recommendations for SSDs in production?
Previous Message Phoenix Kiula 2011-11-24 12:14:28 Re: Installed. Now what?