From: | Feng Tian <ftian(at)vitessedata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 |
Date: | 2015-09-24 20:31:13 |
Message-ID: | CAFWGqnsAQwngvep5WnT28GyhY_PNLO+XR1-FMJYEHHyh9XTNLw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Feng Tian <ftian(at)vitessedata(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is an extension for 64 and 128 bit decimal types using IEEE decimal
> floating point. The original idea/implementation is from
> http://pgxn.org/dist/pgdecimal/1.0.0/ Original thread for dicussion is
> at
>
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFj8pRApakE6s-H2yJcXD=UBpukWA6i7rx4VUVTb4PUHgA5FeA@mail.gmail.com
>
> I reimplemented 64/128 bits instead of 32/64 bits. The code use decNumber
> library instead of _Decimal64/128 of GCC. Also added more operators.
>
> Compared to numeric type, decimal64 arithmetics is about 2x faster,
> decimal128 is about 1.5x faster. However, the cast between decimal and
> float4/8 is implemented rather naively and slow. As always, it depends on
> workload, decimal may take more, or less space, may be slower if cast is
> frequently performed.
>
> Agains, thanks to the original author okbob (Pavel). Enjoy.
>
> Thanks,
> Feng
>
>
Ah, link.
https://github.com/vitesse-ftian/pgdecimal
Thanks,
Feng
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-09-24 20:35:19 | Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 |
Previous Message | Feng Tian | 2015-09-24 20:29:52 | Decimal64 and Decimal128 |