From: | Matthew Kleiman <mkleiman(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgAdmin4] To Extract or Not To Extract - That is the Question |
Date: | 2017-06-02 14:40:03 |
Message-ID: | CAFS4TJZx3C-G35wYZ3mbTrFufGcu8NwHVqsYJ_easdZfLsmiLQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
We are working on this now. Should I open a bug or a feature in redmine to
track this work publicly or just keep it in our backlog only?
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Matthew Kleiman <mkleiman(at)pivotal(dot)io>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Hackers!
>>
>> We noticed that there have been quite a few Redmine issues that ended up
>> being related to the same function in sqleditor.js. We were wondering if
>> it might be a good idea to extract this function and test it. This would
>> allow us to iterate more quickly and identify potential bugs before they're
>> opened. There have been a few merge conflicts already in this area and
>> without tests it is difficult to resolve these with high confidence.
>>
>> The function in question is the callback for onSelectedRangesChanged. In
>> the latest commit on master (12fa02), it's from line 696 to 773.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Sounds sensible. Do you have a proposed patch?
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matthew Kleiman | 2017-06-02 14:47:48 | Re: Process for Creating Translations |
Previous Message | Murtuza Zabuawala | 2017-06-02 12:12:05 | [pgAdmin4][PATCH] To make $ quoting consistent |