Re: [pgAdmin4] To Extract or Not To Extract - That is the Question

From: Matthew Kleiman <mkleiman(at)pivotal(dot)io>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgAdmin4] To Extract or Not To Extract - That is the Question
Date: 2017-06-02 14:40:03
Message-ID: CAFS4TJZx3C-G35wYZ3mbTrFufGcu8NwHVqsYJ_easdZfLsmiLQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

We are working on this now. Should I open a bug or a feature in redmine to
track this work publicly or just keep it in our backlog only?

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Matthew Kleiman <mkleiman(at)pivotal(dot)io>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Hackers!
>>
>> We noticed that there have been quite a few Redmine issues that ended up
>> being related to the same function in sqleditor.js. We were wondering if
>> it might be a good idea to extract this function and test it. This would
>> allow us to iterate more quickly and identify potential bugs before they're
>> opened. There have been a few merge conflicts already in this area and
>> without tests it is difficult to resolve these with high confidence.
>>
>> The function in question is the callback for onSelectedRangesChanged. In
>> the latest commit on master (12fa02), it's from line 696 to 773.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Sounds sensible. Do you have a proposed patch?
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew Kleiman 2017-06-02 14:47:48 Re: Process for Creating Translations
Previous Message Murtuza Zabuawala 2017-06-02 12:12:05 [pgAdmin4][PATCH] To make $ quoting consistent