Re: COUNT and GROUP BY performing strangely

From: Jayadevan M <maymala(dot)jayadevan(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: James David Smith <james(dot)david(dot)smith(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COUNT and GROUP BY performing strangely
Date: 2013-10-25 11:22:19
Message-ID: CAFS1N4iviBdOuTrC2ad=V6N+WVO=fOYrPFsiLrhL0bkNd8C+og@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2054235/why-doesnt-postgres-group-by-null-select-counts
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/functions-aggregate.html
says "number of input rows for which the value ofexpression is not null"

On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:38 PM, James David Smith <
james(dot)david(dot)smith(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Any thoughts on the below three queries please?
>
> james_traffic=# SELECT count(*) FROM stage;
> count
> --------
> 430991
> (1 row)
>
> james_traffic=# SELECT bad_flag, count(bad_flag) FROM stage GROUP BY
> bad_flag;
> bad_flag | count
> ----------+-------
> | 0
> 1 | 4102
> (2 rows)
>
> james_traffic=# SELECT count(bad_flag) FROM stage;
> count
> -------
> 4102
> (1 row)
>
> I'm confused as to why the second query doesn't return this:
>
> bad_flag | count
> --------------+-------
> | 426889
> 1 | 4102
>
> It should count the records surely, even if the field is blank/null ?
>
> Thanks
>
> James
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-novice mailing list (pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-novice
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James David Smith 2013-10-25 11:24:44 Re: COUNT and GROUP BY performing strangely
Previous Message Thomas Kellerer 2013-10-25 10:26:41 Re: COUNT and GROUP BY performing strangely