From: | Jayadevan M <maymala(dot)jayadevan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: search_path and current_schema |
Date: | 2013-10-28 01:35:16 |
Message-ID: | CAFS1N4g-7qYyYqpj3oJ5HEusK+_-WwY10mfSug19rHet-=KtTg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
OK. When I logged in as a user who had access to the schema, the output
from current_schemas and search_path were matching.
Thanks.
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Jayadevan M <maymala(dot)jayadevan(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I thought current_schemas and search_path will return the same set of
> > schemas (except that current_schema will show pg_catalog also, if we use
> > true). Shouldn't mynewschema appear in the output of select
> > current_schemas(true)?
>
> Only if it actually exists (and you have usage privilege on it). See
> the description of the search_path variable: nonexistent entries are
> silently ignored.
>
> Possibly this behavior should be documented under current_schemas()
> as well as under the GUC variable.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | anatoly techtonik | 2013-10-28 06:30:38 | Re: PGAdmin and user privileges - what I do wrong? |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2013-10-27 23:56:16 | Re: Work table |