Re: rhel6 rpm file locations

From: Ted Toth <txtoth(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Devrim Gunduz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Jeff Frost <jeff(dot)frost(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: rhel6 rpm file locations
Date: 2015-05-28 13:54:09
Message-ID: CAFPpqQFNHPLeLpdDq4+6mH1wA6OHirUYU5BJAjsK5Lg2aOTHLQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Are there any other packagers following the Fedora 'standards' that
you are aware of?

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Ted Toth <txtoth(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Ted Toth <txtoth(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> I'm trying to use a newer version than is available from RH in our
>>>> custom distro but am having problems install both x86_64 and i686 rpms
>>>> because file conflicts. We have some i686 packages that use libgdal
>>>> which pulls in libpq which ends up in the same location in both the
>>>> x86_64 and i686 postgresql lib and devel rpms. Why doesn't postgresql
>>>> use _libdir and other standard rpm macros?
>>>
>>> From where did you get the RPMs that you are using?
>>>
>>> There is more than one set, and they are maintained by different people.
>>
>> http://yum.postgresql.org/9.4/redhat/rhel-6.5-x86_64/
>
> Those are maintained by Devrim Gunduz and Jeff Frost. Adding them to
> the "Cc" list.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-05-28 13:59:35 Re: Possible pointer dereference
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-05-28 12:51:04 Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1